Wednesday, September 9, 2026

Jesus Christ as Lord of History

 



“This pre-incarnate Christ was not merely a spectator or even just an agent

of creation—He was its purpose. All things were created "through Him and

for Him" (Colossians 1:16). The entire cosmos, from the most distant galaxy

to the smallest subatomic particle, exists for Christ, points to Christ,

and finds its meaning in Christ”.

  

Excellent article written on 06 Apr 2025:

Jesus Christ: The Eternal King and Lord of Time

  

Jesus Christ: The Eternal King and Lord of Time

 

Introduction: The Fullness of Christ Revealed

 

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made."
— John 1:1-3

 

In the grand tapestry of divine revelation, one figure stands supreme, transcending time, space, and the limitations of human understanding. Jesus Christ—the Word made flesh, the Alpha and Omega, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords—is not merely a historical figure who appeared in Bethlehem two thousand years ago. He is the eternal Son of God, whose glory, power, and sovereignty stretch from before creation's dawn to beyond the consummation of all things.

 

He is the central figure of Scripture, history, and eternity—the one in whom "all the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily" (Colossians 2:9).

 

This essay explores the surpassing glory, worth, and majesty of Jesus Christ as revealed across the entire sweep of Scripture and divine history. From His pre-incarnate manifestations to patriarchs and prophets, to His incarnation, death, and resurrection, to His coming again in glory—Jesus Christ stands as the sovereign Lord of time and creation, working out the divine plan of redemption that was established "before the foundation of the world" (Ephesians 1:4).

 

As we trace His movements through history, His appearances in various forms, His words spoken through prophets, and His actions in establishing and fulfilling the covenant promises, we behold the breathtaking unity of God's redemptive purpose centered in the person of His Son. We see how every thread of prophecy, every divine oath, every covenant promise, and every appointed time finds its fulfillment in Jesus Christ, who is "the same yesterday, today, and forever" (Hebrews 13:8).

 

I. Christ Before Creation: The Eternal Son

 

Before anything else existed, the Son was. Not merely existing, but reigning in glory, equal with the Father, participating in the divine counsel, and preparing to execute the divine plan for creation and redemption.

 

"He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist."
— Colossians 1:15-17

 

The Son's eternal existence is foundational to understanding His role throughout Scripture. He did not come into being at His birth in Bethlehem; He has always been. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit existed in perfect communion before creation began—a divine fellowship of love and glory.

 

"Father, I desire that they also whom You gave Me may be with Me where I am, that they may behold My glory which You have given Me; for You loved Me before the foundation of the world."
— John 17:24

 

When the divine counsel declared "Let Us make man in Our image" (Genesis 1:26), the Son was an active participant in creation. As John affirms, "All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made" (John 1:3). Creation itself bears the imprint of the Son's wisdom, power, and artistry.

 

This pre-incarnate Christ was not merely a spectator or even just an agent of creation—He was its purpose. All things were created "through Him and for Him" (Colossians 1:16). The entire cosmos, from the most distant galaxy to the smallest subatomic particle, exists for Christ, points to Christ, and finds its meaning in Christ.

 

II. The Pre-Incarnate Christ: Divine Manifestations

 

Throughout the Old Testament, we find mysterious appearances of a figure often identified as "the Angel of the LORD"—not a created angel, but a unique manifestation who speaks with divine authority, receives worship, and is identified with YHWH Himself. These theophanies (divine appearances) represent the pre-incarnate Christ interacting with humanity, establishing the covenant lineage, and preparing the way for His eventual incarnation.

 

A. Christ and the Patriarchs

 

1. The Word to Abraham

 

When Abraham received the covenant promises, it was the pre-incarnate Christ who appeared to him:

 

"After these things the word of the LORD came to Abram in a vision, saying, 'Do not be afraid, Abram. I am your shield, your exceedingly great reward.'"
— Genesis 15:1

 

This "word of the LORD" (דְבַר־יְהוָה / debar-YHWH) who came to Abraham was the same eternal Word (λόγος / Logos) who would later become flesh in John 1:14. When the covenant was formally established through sacrifice, it was this divine Word who passed between the pieces, swearing by Himself to fulfill the covenant promises (Genesis 15:17-18).

 

Later, when three visitors appeared to Abraham at Mamre, one of them was addressed as "YHWH" (Genesis 18:1-3). This was no mere angel but the pre-incarnate Son, who discussed the fate of Sodom with Abraham as one having divine authority to judge. The eternal Lamb--slain before the foundation of the world.

 

2. Wrestling with Jacob

 

At Peniel, Jacob wrestled with a mysterious figure whom he later identified as God Himself:

 

"So Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: 'For I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.'"
— Genesis 32:30

 

This divine wrestler, who blessed Jacob and gave him the name Israel, was none other than the pre-incarnate Christ. The prophet Hosea later confirmed this, saying Jacob "struggled with God. Yes, he struggled with the Angel and prevailed" (Hosea 12:3-4). This "Angel" who is also "God" represents the Son before His incarnation, condescending to establish the covenant with the patriarch of the twelve tribes.

 

B. Christ in the Exodus and Wilderness

 

1. The Burning Bush

 

When Moses encountered the burning bush in Midian, the text states: "And the Angel of the LORD appeared to him in a flame of fire from the midst of a bush" (Exodus 3:2). Yet this Angel then identifies Himself as "the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob" (Exodus 3:6), and reveals His name as "I AM WHO I AM" (Exodus 3:14).

 

This was no created angel but the eternal Son, the second person of the Trinity, appearing to commission Moses for the liberation of His people. Jesus Himself later claimed this divine name, declaring to the Jewish leaders, "Before Abraham was, I AM" (John 8:58), thus identifying Himself as the God of the burning bush.

 

2. The Pillar of Cloud and Fire

 

Throughout the Exodus and wilderness wanderings, God led Israel with a pillar of cloud by day and fire by night. This visible manifestation of divine presence and guidance was identified as "the Angel of God" (Exodus 14:19) who protected Israel at the Red Sea. This Angel was none other than the pre-incarnate Christ, leading His people out of bondage and toward the Promised Land.

 

"Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea... and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ."
— 1 Corinthians 10:1, 4

 

Paul explicitly identifies the spiritual Rock that provided water in the wilderness as Christ Himself, confirming that the pre-incarnate Son was actively present with Israel throughout their wilderness journey.

 

3. Sinai and the Covenant

 

When God descended on Mount Sinai to establish the covenant with Israel, it was the pre-incarnate Son who mediated this covenant. Moses and the elders of Israel "saw the God of Israel. And there was under His feet as it were a paved work of sapphire stone, and it was like the very heavens in its clarity" (Exodus 24:10).

 

This vision of God in human form—with feet walking on sapphire—was a glimpse of the pre-incarnate Christ, who would later take permanent human form in the incarnation. The book of Hebrews confirms that Christ is "the Mediator of the new covenant" (Hebrews 12:24), just as He was the mediator of the old covenant at Sinai.

 

C. Christ in the Time of Judges and Kings

 

1. The Captain of the LORD's Army

 

When Joshua was preparing to conquer Jericho, he encountered a mysterious figure:

 

"And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted his eyes and looked, and behold, a Man stood opposite him with His sword drawn in His hand. And Joshua went to Him and said to Him, 'Are You for us or for our adversaries?' So He said, 'No, but as Commander of the army of the LORD I have now come.'"
— Joshua 5:13-14

 

Joshua fell on his face in worship, and the Commander did not rebuke him but instead said, "Take your sandal off your foot, for the place where you stand is holy" (Joshua 5:15)—the same command given to Moses at the burning bush.

 

This was the pre-incarnate Christ, appearing as the divine Commander leading Israel's conquest of the Promised Land.

 

2. Gideon's Visitor

 

When the Angel of the LORD appeared to Gideon, the text again reveals this was no ordinary angel:

 

"Then the LORD turned to him and said, 'Go in this might of yours, and you shall save Israel from the hand of the Midianites. Have I not sent you?'"
— Judges 6:14

 

The narrative shifts seamlessly between "the Angel of the LORD" and "the LORD" Himself speaking to Gideon. When Gideon presented an offering, "the Angel of the LORD departed from his sight" (Judges 6:21), leading Gideon to exclaim, "Alas, O Lord GOD! For I have seen the Angel of the LORD face to face" (Judges 6:22).

 

This divine visitor, accepting worship and speaking with divine authority, was the pre-incarnate Christ, commissioning a deliverer for His people.

 

3. David's Lord

 

In Psalm 110, David wrote about a divine figure whom he called "my Lord":

 

"The LORD said to my Lord, 'Sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool.'"
— Psalm 110:1

 

Jesus Himself cited this verse to prove His divine identity, asking the Pharisees, "If David then calls Him 'Lord,' how is He his Son?" (Matthew 22:45). This psalm reveals the pre-incarnate Christ, enthroned at the Father's right hand, awaiting the time when He would take on human flesh as David's descendant while remaining David's divine Lord.

 

In Psalm 2, David saw the divine decree establishing the Son as King:

 

"I will declare the decree: The LORD has said to Me, 'You are My Son, today I have begotten You. Ask of Me, and I will give You the nations for Your inheritance, and the ends of the earth for Your possession.'"
— Psalm 2:7-8

 

This decree, spoken in eternity past, refers to the eternal Son who would later be incarnated as the Messiah. David's prophetic visions revealed the pre-incarnate Christ's royal status and coming reign.

 

In Psalm 45, David beheld the divine King in His beauty and majesty:

 

"Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; a scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom."
— Psalm 45:6

 

The book of Hebrews directly applies this verse to Christ (Hebrews 1:8-9), confirming that David was seeing the pre-incarnate Son in His divine glory.

 

D. Christ in the Prophets

 

1. Isaiah's Visions

 

When Isaiah "saw the Lord sitting on a throne, high and lifted up, and the train of His robe filled the temple" (Isaiah 6:1), he was beholding the pre-incarnate Christ in glory. John confirms this, stating, "These things Isaiah said when he saw His glory and spoke of Him" (John 12:41).

 

This vision of the thrice-holy King surrounded by seraphim was a glimpse of the eternal Son, whose incarnation and redemptive work Isaiah would prophesy throughout his book.

 

In Isaiah 53, the prophet received a detailed vision of the coming Suffering Servant, the incarnate Christ who would be "wounded for our transgressions" and "bruised for our iniquities" (Isaiah 53:5).

 

This extraordinary prophecy, written seven centuries before the crucifixion, reveals the precision with which the eternal Son planned His redemptive mission.

 

In Isaiah 63, the prophet sees a vision of the divine warrior coming from Edom:

 

"Who is this who comes from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah, this One who is glorious in His apparel, traveling in the greatness of His strength?—'I who speak in righteousness, mighty to save.'"
— Isaiah 63:1

 

This warrior, stained with the blood of His enemies, is the pre-incarnate Christ revealing His future role as judge and deliverer. The vision anticipates both His first coming (to save) and His second coming (to judge).

 

2. Ezekiel's Vision of the Glory

 

When Ezekiel saw "the likeness of the glory of the LORD" by the River Chebar, he beheld "the likeness of a throne, in appearance like a sapphire stone; on the likeness of the throne was a likeness with the appearance of a man high above it" (Ezekiel 1:26).

 

This human form enveloped in radiant glory was the pre-incarnate Christ, the visible manifestation of the invisible God, seated on His heavenly throne. The sapphire throne echoes the vision given to Moses and the elders at Sinai, showing the consistent appearance of the pre-incarnate Son throughout Israel's history.

 

3. Daniel's Visions

 

Daniel beheld "One like the Son of Man, coming with the clouds of heaven" who "came to the Ancient of Days" and received "dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him" (Daniel 7:13-14). This was the pre-incarnate Christ revealed in His future glory, receiving universal kingship from the Father.

 

Later, by the River Tigris, Daniel saw a glorious figure:

 

"I lifted my eyes and looked, and behold, a certain man clothed in linen, whose waist was girded with gold of Uphaz! His body was like beryl, His face like the appearance of lightning, His eyes like torches of fire, His arms and feet like burnished bronze in color, and the sound of His words like the voice of a multitude."
— Daniel 10:5-6


This description closely matches John's vision of the glorified Christ in Revelation 1:13-16, confirming that Daniel encountered the pre-incarnate Son in His divine splendor. This glorious figure raised His hand to heaven and swore the oath that would seal Daniel's prophetic timeline—the same gesture that would be repeated by the mighty angel in Revelation 10, confirming the continuity of Christ's sovereign control over prophetic history.

 

4. The Minor Prophets

 

Zechariah saw visions of "the Angel of the LORD" who interceded for Jerusalem (Zechariah 1:12) and functioned as the divine presence among His people. This Angel is identified as YHWH Himself when He declares, "I am zealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with great zeal" (Zechariah 1:14).

 

Zechariah also prophesied the Messiah's entry into Jerusalem on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9), His betrayal for thirty pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12-13), and His piercing (Zechariah 12:10)—all precise details of Christ's first coming that would be fulfilled centuries later.

 

Malachi foretold the coming of "the Messenger of the covenant" who would "suddenly come to His temple" (Malachi 3:1). This divine Messenger, equated with the Lord Himself, is the pre-incarnate Christ who would later visit the temple in human flesh.

 

Micah prophesied the Messiah's birth in Bethlehem while affirming His eternal nature:

 

"But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of you shall come forth to Me the One to be Ruler in Israel, whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting."
— Micah 5:2

 

This remarkable prophecy reveals both the incarnation's specificity (Bethlehem) and the eternal pre-existence of the Son ("from everlasting"). The pre-incarnate Christ was orchestrating the precise details of His future earthly mission through the prophets.

 

III. The Incarnate Christ: God Among Us

 

The mystery of the incarnation stands at the center of redemptive history: "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth" (John 1:14). The eternal Son, who had revealed Himself partially through theophanies and prophetic visions, now took on permanent human nature without diminishing His divine nature.

 

"Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men."
— Philippians 2:5-7

 

His birth fulfilled dozens of specific prophecies given centuries earlier:

 

  • Born of a virgin (Isaiah 7:14)
  • Born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2)
  • From the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:10)
  • From the lineage of David (2 Samuel 7:12-13)
  • Worshiped by kings bearing gifts (Psalm 72:10-11)
  • Called out of Egypt (Hosea 11:1)
  • Preceded by a messenger (Isaiah 40:3)

 

The mathematical probability of one person fulfilling even a fraction of these prophecies by chance is statistically impossible, demonstrating the sovereign orchestration of the eternal Son throughout history.

 

Christ's earthly ministry revealed His divine identity through His:

 

  • Authoritative teaching: "He taught them as one having authority" (Matthew 7:29)
  • Miraculous power: healing the sick, casting out demons, raising the dead
  • Command over nature: calming storms, walking on water, multiplying food
  • Claims of divinity: "I and My Father are one" (John 10:30)
  • Fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies: "Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing" (Luke 4:21)

 

His perfect life fulfilled the righteousness requirements of the Law that no other human could achieve. As both fully God and fully man, He alone could serve as the perfect mediator between God and humanity, bridging the infinite gulf created by sin.

 

IV. The Crucified Christ: Divine Sacrifice

 

The crucifixion of Jesus Christ represents the central act of redemptive history—the moment when the eternal Son bore the sins of humanity and satisfied divine justice. This was no tragic accident but the fulfillment of the divine plan established "before the foundation of the world" (1 Peter 1:20).

 

"For Christ also suffered once for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive by the Spirit."
— 1 Peter 3:18

 

Christ's suffering and death fulfilled dozens of specific Old Testament prophecies, including:

 

  • Betrayed by a friend (Psalm 41:9)
  • Sold for thirty pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12)
  • Silent before His accusers (Isaiah 53:7)
  • Pierced in His hands and feet (Psalm 22:16)
  • Crucified with transgressors (Isaiah 53:12)
  • Garments divided by casting lots (Psalm 22:18)
  • Given gall and vinegar (Psalm 69:21)
  • No bones broken (Psalm 34:20)
  • Pierced (Zechariah 12:10)
  • Buried in a rich man's tomb (Isaiah 53:9)

 

The cross stands as the supreme demonstration of both divine justice and divine love. As the hymn writer put it, "Here might I stay and sing, no story so divine; never was love, dear King, never was grief like Thine."

 

On the cross, the eternal Son who had created the cosmos now bore the full weight of human sin. The One who had appeared to Moses in burning glory now endured the unimaginable darkness of separation from the Father. The Commander of heaven's armies submitted to the most shameful execution devised by human cruelty.

 

Yet in this apparent defeat lay the greatest victory in cosmic history. Through His death, Christ:

 

  • Paid the ransom for many (Mark 10:45)
  • Became the propitiation for our sins (1 John 2:2)
  • Canceled the record of debt against us (Colossians 2:14)
  • Disarmed the principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15)
  • Destroyed the power of death (Hebrews 2:14)
  • Reconciled all things to God (Colossians 1:20)

 

The eternal Son, who had sworn the covenant oath to Abraham, now ratified the New Covenant with His own blood. The divine Lawgiver became the perfect sacrifice to satisfy His own holy requirements. The Judge of all the earth subjected Himself to human judgment to save the guilty.

 

V. The Resurrected Christ: Death Conquered

 

The resurrection of Jesus Christ stands as the divine vindication of His perfect sacrifice and the definitive demonstration of His divine identity. By conquering death, Christ proved both His deity and the effectiveness of His atoning work.

 

"He was delivered up because of our offenses, and was raised because of our justification."
— Romans 4:25

 

The resurrection fulfilled ancient prophecies, including:

 

  • "You will not leave my soul in Sheol, nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption" (Psalm 16:10)
  • "After two days He will revive us; on the third day He will raise us up" (Hosea 6:2)
  • "I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves" (Ezekiel 37:12)

 

Christ's resurrection transformed a small band of frightened disciples into fearless apostles willing to die for their testimony. It established the Christian faith on an empirical historical foundation—over 500 eyewitnesses saw the risen Christ (1 Corinthians 15:6), and many of them suffered martyrdom rather than recant their testimony.

 

More than just a historical event, the resurrection has cosmic significance. It represents:

 

  • The firstfruits of the new creation (1 Corinthians 15:20)
  • The defeat of death itself (1 Corinthians 15:54-55)
  • The guarantee of believers' resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:22)
  • The validation of the gospel message (1 Corinthians 15:14)
  • The demonstration of divine power (Ephesians 1:19-20)

 

The risen Christ, still bearing the wounds of crucifixion in His glorified body, reveals that the incarnation was not temporary. The eternal Son has permanently united Himself with human nature, elevating humanity to unprecedented dignity. The God who created humanity in His image has now taken that image upon Himself forever.

 

VI. The Ascended Christ: Universal King

 

Following His resurrection, Christ ascended to heaven, returning to the glory He had shared with the Father before the world began, but now bringing glorified humanity to the throne of God.

 

"When He had by Himself purged our sins, [He] sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high."
— Hebrews 1:3

 

The ascension fulfilled Christ's words to Mary Magdalene: "I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God" (John 20:17). It also fulfilled Daniel's vision of "One like the Son of Man" coming to the Ancient of Days to receive an everlasting dominion (Daniel 7:13-14).

 

From His heavenly throne, the ascended Christ now:

 

  • Serves as our High Priest (Hebrews 4:14-16)
  • Intercedes for believers (Romans 8:34)
  • Sends the Holy Spirit (John 16:7)
  • Gives gifts to the Church (Ephesians 4:8)
  • Rules over all creation (Ephesians 1:20-22)
  • Prepares a place for His followers (John 14:2-3)

 

His ascension does not represent absence but a different mode of presence. Through the Holy Spirit, Christ is "with you always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew 28:20). The incarnate One who walked the dusty roads of Galilee now fills all things (Ephesians 4:10), being present wherever two or three gather in His name (Matthew 18:20).

 

The ascended Christ now bears the highest name and receives universal worship:

 

"Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father."
— Philippians 2:9-11

 

This universal acclamation fulfills Isaiah's prophecy that "every knee shall bow, every tongue shall take an oath" (Isaiah 45:23). The ascended Christ has received the very worship that YHWH declared was His alone, confirming again the full deity of the Son.

….



 

Monday, September 7, 2026

Scots and the Ku Klux Klan

 



When six bored and bitter former Confederate officers formed a fraternal society, they drew on their Scottish background. 'Clan' turned to 'Klan' and the oldest and most feared racist hate group in America – the Ku Klux Klan – was born”.

 

The role of Scots in shaping the concept of the American Dream is a story often celebrated but could Scottish settlers have also had a hand in America’s racist nightmare?

 

After the devastating Civil War, attitudes in the South were hardened by defeat and fear of the newly-freed slaves. When six bored and bitter former Confederate officers formed a fraternal society, they drew on their Scottish background.

 

'Clan' turned to 'Klan' and the oldest and most feared racist hate group in America – the Ku Klux Klan – was born. 

 

Neil Oliver travels over two thousand miles to examine links between racism today and the Scottish settlers that first occupied America's Deep South.

 

Throughout the 18th Century, hundreds of thousands of Scots emigrated to America. Some believe that it was their wariness and moral certainty that significantly shaped the South into an isolated, fearful society that easily took to slave-owning when the opportunity came. 

 

Now, well over 800 hate groups stalk the United States and Neil finishes his journey by visiting the Neo-Confederate League of the South. The League advocates a return to a separate Southern society run by what they call ‘Anglo Celts’ and Neil discovers that here in the Deep South, Scottish-ness and some old attitudes still abide.  

 

Thursday, August 6, 2026

A Hadrian’s or a Clayton’s Wall?

 




by

Damien F. Mackey

 


“That a portion of Hadrian’s Wall remains standing today

has largely been attributed to the work of John Clayton,

an official in the city government of Newcastle and

an antiquities scholar, in the 19th century”.

 History.com

 

Who was this Hadrian?

 

Most of Hadrian’s life “is a garbled confection”, according to Mary Beard, a trustee of the British Museum: A very modern emperor | Books | The Guardian

 

…. Most of it is a garbled confection, weaving together without much regard for chronology allegations of conspiracies, accounts of palace intrigue, and vendettas on Hadrian's part - plus an assortment of curious facts and personal titbits (his beard, it is claimed, was worn to cover up his bad skin). To fill the gaps, to make a coherent story out of the extraordinary material remains of his reign, to explain what drove the man, modern writers have been forced back on to their prejudices and familiarising assumptions about Roman imperial power and personalities.

 

So, for example, where - thanks to the surviving ancient literary accounts - it has been impossible to see Nero as anything other than a rapacious megalomaniac, Hadrian has morphed conveniently into cultured art collector and amateur architect. Where Nero's relationships with men have to be seen as part of the corruption of his reign, Hadrian has been turned into a troubled gay. Hadrian seems familiar to us - for we have made him so.

 

The British Museum exhibition presents Hadrian as an appropriate successor to the first emperor of China and his terracotta army, both key figures in the foundation and development of early imperial societies. Maybe so. But an even better reason to visit this stunning show is to see how the myth of a Roman emperor has been created - and continues to be created - out of our own imagination and the dazzling but sometimes puzzling array of statues, silver plates and lost keys of slaughtered Jewish freedom-fighters.

 

In the previous paragraph, Mary Beard had told how poorly attested Hadrian is as far as biographical evidence goes:

 

The only fully surviving ancient biography is a short (20 pages or so) life - one of a series of colourful but flagrantly unreliable biographies of Roman emperors and princes written by person or persons unknown, sometime in the fourth or fifth centuries AD. This includes one or two nice anecdotes, which may or may not reflect an authentic tradition about Hadrian.

 

So, might our impressions of Hadrian today be more like a neatly bottled Claytons instead of the real thing?

 

After all, it was John Clayton (d. 1890) of the Victorian era who saved Hadrian’s Wall from well-nigh extinction after the vandalisation of it by General George Wade in 1746:

Hadrian's Wall Archives - The History JarThe History Jar

“I first heard of General George Wade as the man who built the Military Road from Newcastle to Carlisle by using some conveniently placed worked stone – Hadrian’s Wall.  It didn’t endear him to me. Across on the Continent he’d served in the Nine Years War and the Wars of the Spanish Succession. In 1724 Wade was sent off to inspect Scotland having done a stint as an MP for Bath and having foiled various Jacobite plots in the SouthWest in 1719. It was he who orchestrated barracks, bridges, roads and fortifications by which the north and Scotland could be controlled – he was made a field marshall for his pains. But it wasn’t until 1746 that he vandalised Hadrian’s Wall. His Military Road is the B6318. It used masonry from the wall and near Brampton simply ploughs along its path”.

 

According to the text books: Hadrian’s Wall | Roman History, England, UK | Britannica

Emperor Hadrian (ruled 117–138 ce) went to Britain in 122 and, in the words of his biographer, “was the first to build a wall, 80 miles long, to separate the Romans from the barbarians.” The initial construction of the wall took approximately six years, and expansions were later made”.

 

But I have quite a different story to tell about Hadrian – that he was not who our history books say he was, or that he was not when they say he was.

 

For a start, the suggestion that the emperor Hadrian could have put down a massive revolt of the Jews in Israel in 132-135 AD – some 60 years after (70 AD) the whole nation had been destroyed, its prized Temple annihilated, and the survivors marched away into captivity, and death – is a pure fantasy.

 

The Grecophile Hadrian was not a Roman emperor at all.

He was the Seleucid Greek tyrant, Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ so-called IV:

 

Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ and Emperor Hadrian

 

(6) Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ and Emperor Hadrian

 

This connection is strengthened insofar as:

 

A Jewish tradition even has Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ as Emperor Hadrian

 

(5) A Jewish tradition has Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ as Emperor Hadrian

 

That would necessitate back-dating Hadrian by about 300 years, to c. 170 BC, the time (conventionally estimated) of king Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’.

However, in my revised chronology, I have brought Antiochus/Hadrian further down the time scale by identifying him also as the emperor Caesar Augustus, at the time of the Nativity of Jesus Christ (Luke 2):

 

Time to consider Hadrian, that ‘mirror-image’ of Antiochus Epiphanes, as also the census emperor Augustus

 

(6) Time to consider Hadrian, that 'mirror-image' of Antiochus Epiphanes, as also the census emperor Augustus

 

And Hadrian may have yet other important alter egos relevant to this article.

 

For, according to my view, he was also Diocletian, whom professor Gunnar Heinsohn had previously re-set as a contemporary of Caesar Augustus:

q-mag-augustus-and-diocletian-heinsohn-061619.pdf

a famed census-taking emperor whom I have gone so far as to identify with Augustus:

 

Census of emperor Diocletian

 

(7) Census of emperor Diocletian

 

The emperor Diocletian was, like Hadrian, a wall builder - as, too, was the emperor Trajan, my final major alter ego for this Greek tyrant:

 

Hadrianus Traianus Caesar – Trajan transmutes to Hadrian

 

(7) Hadrianus Traianus Caesar – Trajan transmutes to Hadrian

 

As with the neo-Assyrian combination, Sargon II and Sennacherib, thought to be, respectively, a father and son succession, but actually the same person:

 

Sargon II and Sennacherib: More than just an overlap

 

(10) Sargon II and Sennacherib: More than just an overlap

 

so with Trajan and Hadrian, thought to be a succession, but actually the same person. And in this latter case, unlike the Assyrian one, even having the same name connection, Trajan (Traian).

 

So, before we could even get to Hadrian’s presumed wall, in Britain, we had needed to (i) re-set him to the era of the Nativity, (ii) as a Seleucid Greek, not Roman, emperor.

 

But that will not be the end of my divergences from the mainstream line of thought. For I must now ask:

 

Was Hadrian ever in Britain –

and where did he build his wall?

 

The first Roman invasion of Britain was, so we are told, by Gaius Julius Caesar.

He is thought to have invaded there twice, in 55 and 54 BC.

 

Except that he didn’t, not even once.

 

The C1st BC Gaius Julius was, like the ‘Second Jewish Revolt’ in the C2nd AD, a fiction:

 

Julius Caesar a fictitious composite

 

(8) Julius Caesar a fictitious composite

 

There were apparently others who bore this name, Gaius Julius, one being supposedly – and most intriguingly – an Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’. I wrote of him briefly in my article:

 

Antiochus IV ‘Epiphanes’ Tripled?

 

(8) Antiochus IV 'Epiphanes' Tripled?

 

… we encounter a third Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ (with some suspiciously late Republican Roman name elements, too: Gaius Julius) who we find to have been contemporaneous with the emperor Hadrian.

And, again, “in whom Greek, oriental, and Roman cultural attitudes mingled”.

 

Although this new Antiochus is considered to have been a person separate from Hadrian, but a friend of the emperor’s, ‘their’ contemporaneity is, in our new context of Hadrian as potentially Antiochus IV ‘Epiphanes’ himself, most intriguing. ….

 

The fact is that, by the Maccabean times, relevant to my revised emperor Hadrian, the Republican (not Imperial) Romans, so admired by the Maccabean freedom fighters, were triumphing in Gaul and remote Spain, with no mention of the far more distant land of Britain (I Maccabees 8:1-4):

 

Eulogy of the Romans. Judas [Maccabeus] had heard of the reputation of the Romans. They were valiant fighters and acted amiably to all who took their side. They established a friendly alliance with all who applied to them. He was also told of their battles and the brave deeds that they performed against the Gauls, conquering them and forcing them to pay tribute; and what they did in Spain to get possession of the silver and gold mines there. By planning and persistence they subjugated the whole region, although it was very remote from their own. 

 

There is no historical evidence whatsoever to suggest that king Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ at this time, who “… previously … had been a hostage in Rome”, had managed to invade far off Britain.

So, I have grave doubts that the emperor Hadrian (revised as Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’) ever went anywhere near Britain.

Hence I would be looking for other origins for the famous wall in northern England, and would be asking: Where was the long wall that Hadrian supposedly built?

 

The emperor Hadrian, who has assuredly left to posterity many remarkable buildings, was quite capable of erecting an impressive wall.

And when he is coupled, through his alter ego of Augustus, with such an impressive master builder as that emperor’s ‘second’, Marcus Agrippa (= Herod):

 

Herod, the emperor’s signet right-hand man

 

(9) Herod, the emperor's signet right-hand man

 

the building legacy becomes even more phenomenal.

 

Truly, this was one of the most extraordinary eras for building in all of ancient history!

 

But the enigmatic, and poorly documented, wall in northern England does not seem to fit comfortably into either the chronology, or the stated purpose, of Hadrian’s Wall (Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Hadriani 2.2):

Hadrian's Wall - Wikipedia

 

The Latin text Historia Augusta states:

 

(Hadrianus) murumque per octoginta milia passuum primus duxit, qui barbaros Romanosque divideret.

 

Translation:

 

(Hadrian) was the first to build a wall, eighty miles long, to separate the Romans from the barbarians.[22]

 

Yes, but where was it actually built?

 

The Wall is something of an enigma:

(2) Review of David J. Breeze, Hadrian's Wall: A History of Archaeological Thought

“Little about the Wall, however, is simple and straightforward. Rival hypotheses regarding, for example, its dates, multiple components, sequence of construction, and function(s), continue unabated. Given the sparse ancient literary references, inscriptions, coins and pottery provide some clues …”.

 

What Is Hadrian’s Wall?

 

Hadrian's Wall - World History Encyclopedia (emphasis added):

Hadrian's Wall (known in antiquity as the Vallum Hadriani or the Vallum Aelian) is a defensive frontier work in northern Britain which dates from 122 CE. [sic] The wall ran from coast to coast at a length of 73 statute miles (120 km). Though the wall is commonly thought to have been built to mark the boundary line between Britain and Scotland, this is not so; no one knows the actual motivation behind its construction but it does not delineate a boundary between two countries.

 

While the wall did simply mark the northern boundary of the Roman Empire in Britain at the time, theories regarding the purpose of such a massive building project range from limiting immigration, to controlling smuggling, to keeping the indigenous people at bay north of the wall”. 

 

Hadrian's Wall Was a Border Checkpoint, Not a Barrier Against the North

“Ask almost anyone why Hadrian’s Wall was built, and you’ll hear a version of the same story: it kept out the Scots. It’s a tidy answer, and it’s wrong in almost every meaningful way. The people living north of the wall in the second century AD were Caledonian and Pictish tribal groups — culturally and politically distinct peoples who had nothing to do with the Scots as a nation or an identity. The word “Scot,” and the kingdom it eventually described, wouldn’t attach to that territory for several more centuries. Projecting modern national labels onto ancient tribal Britain is roughly equivalent to calling the legions who built the wall “Italians.”

But there’s a deeper problem with that myth, one any Roman military commander would have recognised immediately: walls don’t stop armies. A determined force can go around a wall, over it, or through it at a point of weakness. Roman generals understood this perfectly. Static barriers were never designed to repel invasion the way a castle gate repels a battering ram. So if Hadrian’s Wall wasn’t a sealed military fortress shutting out northern tribes, what was it actually for?”

 

The emperor (Hadrianus) Trajan, who I claimed above was Hadrian, is supposed to have built a wall, but in Europe.

Was this Hadrian’s Wall?

 

The trouble is, Trajan’s Wall may actually have been built well after Trajan:

Trajan's Wall - Wikipedia

Trajan's Wall (RomanianValul lui Traian) is the name used for several linear earthen fortifications (Latinvalla) found across Eastern EuropeMoldovaRomania, and Ukraine. Contrary to the name and popular belief, evidence shows the ramparts were likely not built under the reign of Trajan, but later, in the period of Late Antiquity and Early Middle Ages. The association with the Roman Emperor Trajan may be a recent scholarly invention of the national awakening movement of the 19th century, linking the emerging identity of the modern Romanian people to the glory of Classical Rome. Documents from medieval Moldavia referred to the earthworks as Troian, likely in reference to a mythological hero in the Romanian and Slavic folklore.[1] The other major earthen fortification in Romania, Brazda lui Novac (Novac's Furrow), is also named after a mythological hero”.

 

This brings us to a very interesting point, one that might have some parallel in the artificial creation of the House of Tudor, “… the national awakening movement of the 19th century”. Enter John Clayton.

 

John Clayton | 1792-1890 | Our Past, Your Future | North East Museums

“John Clayton (1792-1890) … used portions of his wealth to buy land which contained parts of Hadrian’s Wall. In doing so, he is directly responsible for having saved remainders of the wall, some of which still stand today. His endeavour began when he inherited his father’s estate, Chesters, in 1832. He investigated the site, prevented stone robbing and began excavating in 1840. He had an active interest in preserving Hadrian’s Wall, as was noted at his memorial: “Whenever an estate came into the market having on it some portion of the Wall, he strove to become its possessor”. This interest involved the acquisition of large portions of the wall and frequently rebuilding parts of it. By the time of his death, Clayton owned close to 20 miles of Hadrian’s Wall and five forts, out of the 80 Roman miles it used to be. This impressive amassment of the site denotes his dedication to its conservation; he was a pioneer in the preservation of its’ history. This was a time when archaeology was expanding as a discipline and public interest in the Wall was increasing”.

 

This was the Victorian era, which could be described as “… the national awakening movement of the 19th century”, or, as we shall read in the Abstract below, “… an increase in interest in the historical pursuit …”. A fine example of this sentiment (now swinging back to the Tudors) can be found in Amy Clarke’s article:

 

What the Tudors Meant to the Victorians: Constructing an Historical Identity in the Nineteenth Century

 

(3) What the Tudors Meant to the Victorians: Constructing an Historical Identity in the Nineteenth Century

 

Abstract

 

In the Victorian period there was an increase in interest in the historical pursuit brought on by the alienating effects of industrialization, modernization, and the rise of the middle class. In a time of great societal and environmental change, the Victorians sought not only to re-establish their bonds with the English past, but to escape the present and seek guidance for the future. Moreover, the Victorians pursued an historical identity which justified their present position as a colonial power, and which celebrated their Protestant pride. The Tudor period was the obvious historical solution, as it had set the precedent for England as a naval nation, and had seen the establishment of the Anglican Church. As such, the Tudor era took a prominent position in the popular historical mindset of the Victorians. This earlier period in England’s history also came to be used as a means of emphasizing Victorian ideals, such as the relationship between the concept of ‘Englishness,’ domesticity and the rural landscape. Moreover, the well-known historical figures of the Tudor years, such as Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, Mary Stuart and Sir Francis Drake, were used by the Victorians as the champions of nineteenth-century causes. Henry and Elizabeth were ‘Englishness’ and Protestantism personified, whilst Mary Stuart displayed all the hallmarks of romanticized femininity, and Sir Francis Drake was the hero of the imperialist dream. Ultimately the Tudor era was utilized by the Victorians as a portion of the English past which legitimized the attitudes and aspirations of the present. The period came to stand for the very concept of an English identity, and as such it was frequently revisited by Victorian popular historians, journalists, children’s authors, artists and architects as a source for patriotic inspiration”.

 

But how real was it?

 

Was it but a Claytons Tudor? – “Tudor” being a term about which Dr. Clifford Davies was so highly critical. On this, see e.g. my article:

 

Term ‘Tudor’ has become grossly distorting

 

(3) Term ‘Tudor’ has become grossly distorting

 

“If ‘Tudor’ is misleading about the royal family, the common designation

‘Tudor subjects’, ‘Tudor men and women’ having ‘Tudor attitudes’, is even more so. There is no evidence that people thought of themselves as such”.

 

Clifford S. L. Davies

 

Most intriguingly, the highly influential Scottish Enlightenment historian, philosopher, and economist, David Hume (1711–1776), pioneered the Tudor concept.

 

As I wrote in my article:

 

Chewing over the House of Tudor

 

(2) Chewing over the House of Tudor

 

…. Dr Davies suggests that the idea of a distinct Tudor period of history was first established in the 18th Century by the historian and philosopher, David Hume.

 

This has proved a very "seductive" way of approaching history, he argues. It also helps to create the idea of a separate historical period, different from what came before and after.

 

But the text-book writers and makers of period dramas should re-think their terminology, as he says that talking about "Tudor men and women" introduces an artificial concept which would have had no contemporary resonance.

If historians aim to "recover the thought processes" of past generations - he says it means understanding how they saw themselves and their own times. ….

 

Here we have an C18th impetus to Tudor (David Hume), followed later by the enthusiastic Victorian era revisitation of Tudor.

 

Somewhat similarly, in the case of the northern England wall, we have the C18th vandalisation of it by General George Wade, followed later by its Victorian era revisitation by John Clayton.

 

It’s enough to make a man yearn for a Claytons!