Showing posts with label Jesus Buddha Krishna Issa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jesus Buddha Krishna Issa. Show all posts

Thursday, October 10, 2013

The East Face of Helicon. West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry. M. L. West



M. L. West, The East Face of Helicon. West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. Pp. 662. ISBN 0-19-815221-3 (pb). $55.00.




Reviewed by Barry Powell, University of Wisconsin-Madison (bbpowell@facstaff.wisc.edu)
Word count: 5203 words


In M. L. West's exemplary edition of Hesiod's Theogony, published in 1966, W. claimed that "Greece is part of Asia; Greek literature is a Near Eastern literature" (p. 31), a remarkable claim when everyone knew that Greece is part of Europe and its literature unlike anything that appeared in the Near East. Yet in the last thirty years others have made similar claims. W. Burkert, especially, argued that "Akkadian cuneiform side by side with Aramaic, Phoenician, and Greek alphabetic script produces a continuum of written culture in the eighth century which stretches from the Euphrates to Italy" (The Orientalizing Revolution, Cambridge, Mass., 1992, p. 31). Here W. sets out to prove his thesis, now a generation old, and we might be disturbed that he has succeeded so well.
There are twelve chapters, which I will briefly review in order.
In the first chapter, "Aegean and Orient," W. takes a bird's-eye view of salient features of Near Eastern and Aegean cultures that for explanation cry out for direct transmission or a common origin. He does not say this, but if one were to compare Bronze Age Greece with Bronze Age China or the Hopi Indians of Arizona one would not expect to find such common elements, here traceable to ancient routes of trade and communication over north Syria, through Cyprus and Rhodes, to Crete and the Aegean. These are cultural artifacts and not the result of parallel evolution.
Such common elements include a substantial list of loan words, often designating commodities, but also social institutions such as kingship with its complex functions and trappings of ritual. The treaties cast by Aegean and Near Eastern kings contain similar formulas. Means of accounting, counting, and weighing are similar or identical. No one disputes the Near Eastern origin of writing on clay tablets or of the Greek alphabet. Musical instruments, and no doubt how they were played and for what reasons, are the same in East and West, as are styles of luxurious behavior. Zeus is a god of storm and high places, and so was Baal of the Levant; each received the same kinds of sacrifices performed in the same way. Finally, W. emphasizes how the transmission of cultural artifacts did not take place at one time but was an ongoing process demonstrable from the Early Mycenaean period down to the sixth century B.C. Chapter 1 is an overview of the whole argument, developed in the rest of the book.
It is hard to restrain enthusiasm, or measure praise, for Chapter 2, "Ancient Literatures of Western Asia," which tells us in short compass the things we want to know about these opaque literatures but could not find the time to discover. First, a bilingual cultural continuum of the Sumero-Akkadians beginning in the third millennium has left mythical narrative poems about a man who escaped the flood, about a hero Gilgamesh who killed a great monster and sought to escape mortality, and about the emergence of the world order through the agency of watery beings. These myths, which tell of the exploits of gods, are now fairly well known among classicists, but little known is the evidence for "historical epic," narratives flattering the conquests of kings. As W. proceeds he illuminates with consistent clarity the meaning of his terms, the relations of language to language and script to script, and in his bibliography alerts the reader to the major publications. W. also describes Sumero-Akkadian wisdom literature, hymns, disputations, and royal inscriptions.
W. turns next to the extremely important Bronze Age literature from Ugarit, the north Syrian port and virtual gateway to the West. Ugaritic literature was written in a writing structurally identical to the later West Semitic Phoenician, Aramaic, and Hebrew scripts, whence sprang the Greek alphabet; so-called Ugaritic cuneiform is the earliest clear historical attestation to this family of scripts. Ugarit therefore offers hope for a tradition in which Homer appears in a direct line of descent. Extant Ugaritic poetry preserves accounts of war among the gods, especially the storm-god Baal's war against Yammu, "Sea," and Mot, "Death." Some poems are about men, however, and we have some hymns.
Next, Hebrew literature, by which is meant, of course, the Bible, a topic of gargantuan proportions that W. somehow summarizes in eight pages: songs, psalms, prophets, wisdom, the Song of Songs, history. Remarkably, there is no epic in Hebrew literature.
Our most regretted loss is the closely related Phoenician literature, because the inventor of the Greek alphabet knew this form of the West Semitic writing, or was even himself a Phoenician. Its nearly complete loss must depend on its having been preserved on papyrus or leather, on the lack of a tradition of writing on clay.
Finally, the ill-defended Hurrians of north Syria, called the Mitanni, prominent internationally in the Late Bronze Age, took over Sumero-Akkadian traditions and handed them to the Indo-European Hittites of Anatolia, who occupied the lands of Mitanni in the ninth to seventh centuries B.C. From this tradition must come the Hurro-Hittite stories about the storm god Teshub's conflict with the older god Kumarbi, evidently the model for Hesiod's Theogony.
Chapter 3, "Of Heaven and Earth," explores the world of the gods, arguing that the features of divine apparatus so familiar to us from Greek poetry are not Greek at all, but raw imports from the East. The organization of heaven, presided over by a company of gods at which stands a powerful patriarch, appears to be Sumerian in origin, copied by Akkadians, Hurrians, Hittites, West Semites, and finally the Greeks. In both East and West the world is divided into provinces over which certain gods exercise priority. From time to time they appear among mortals, their presence revealed by an aura of brilliance. Although Zeus is Indo-European in origin, his office, epithets, and forms of behavior are taken from Eastern literary archetypes.
Even so are the relations of humans to the divine realm similar in the East and West, and such specific myths as the destruction of mankind, and such themes as the loss of perpetual youth, the knowledge of good and evil, and the necessity for toil to survive in a fallen world that is distant from a heaven to which men once had admittance. Even so, in East as in West, does human suffering come from the gods' anger, as do human blessings and divine favor granted to certain individuals. Kingship comes from heaven, or has its blessing, and human kings can even become gods. The division of the universe into heaven, earth, sea, and underworld is Eastern, as is the notion that a gate opens into heaven and that water bounds the cosmos.
Such very odd expressions as "the navel of the earth" turn out to have Semitic models. Ghosts, too behave in similar ways in Greece and the ancient East: they "go down" to their abode, but never return. Water separates this world from the next, which, like heaven, is entered through gates. The land of no return is also a house, ruled over by a king or queen, a place of gloom and filth. There the strengthless dead abide, bloodless and weak.
In Chapter 4, "Ars Poetica," West examines specific forms of style and expression, things we ordinarily take to be culturally specific. Whereas verse forms so complex as the hexameter cannot be found in the East (on the other hand, they could not have been notated in prealphabetic writings), recurring phrases and otiose means of expression are as common there as they are in Homeric epic. Narrative strategies are strikingly similar, too, for example the initiation of action by describing an unsatisfactory situation followed by complaint to the gods, their deliberation, and finally measures taken. In just this way Homer initiates the action of the Iliad, and it recurs repeatedly in Near Eastern narrative.
The "Divine Comedy" of gods familiar from Greek archaic poetry can be paralleled in most particulars: the assembly to determine action, often on a mountain top, but often too with dissension of certain gods against the chief god; the gods' intervention on earth among the affairs of men; the dream, either as message or symbol; the messenger as agent of narrative action; the use of direct speech introduced by stereotyped formulas and such responses a speech can elicit as downcast eyes, biting one's lip, or smacking one's thighs.
Genre scenes that punctuate the narrative are similar in Greece and in the East: scenes of feasting where singers entertain and visitors arrive, sometimes refusing to take their seats, and scenes of dressing and journeys by chariot. In descriptions of war, focus falls on the last year or the final stages of the war. The king addresses his army. Gideon, like Agamemnon, "tested" his troops, only to discover they all wanted to go home. We get a catalogue of forces. Gods lead armies in battle. They smash the weapons of heroes. In battle, first comes a kill, then a breaking-up into individual encounters. Dust envelops the warriors. A great man goes berserk and kills many. Single combat is waged, as between Hector and Ajax or David and Goliath. Threats are made, for example that the enemy will be eaten by dogs. A plea for mercy is refused. City-sackers kill everything in sight, men, women, children. Similes, long or short, enhance vividness. In Ugaritic "he was groaning like a lion"; in Homer he was "groaning like a bearded lion." So pervasive and detailed are the similarities between such elements in Near Eastern poetry and Greek poetry that we cannot doubt a historical connection.
Chapter 5, "A Form of Words," looks more closely at resemblances between actual verbal formulations. So the earth is "broad" and "dark" in both traditions. Decisions are made "by the will of the gods" and the outcome "lies on the knees of the gods." The hands of God or the gods lie upon the people. Kings are "servants " of gods. The gods "hear the voice" of suppliants. Collections of deities are "sons of gods." Battles are "mixed," the slain "bite the dust." In speeches words flow "like honey" and if false are "twisted." Tears are common in moments of tension. Thoughts are formed "in the heart" or come from outside, falling upon one. Soil is "fat." Iniquity "reaches to heaven" and warriors "trust in their strength." "Forever" is "all days." Beautiful women are "equal to a goddess." Kings are "bulls." Battalions advance "like storm-clouds," as numberless "as sand" or "as the stars." Heroes are "lions" or "wolves."
The bird of prey destroying the weak is a common image. The fearful enemy flee "like deer." Warriors pour forth like "wasps from a nest." Missiles "rain from the sky." Heroes groan for fallen comrades like "a lion whose cubs are stolen." The wounded groan "like women in childbirth." Important structures gleam "like the sun or the moon." Cloth "shines like a star." Hearts are "of stone," words are "windy," and the same word designates "grain" and "life."
Speech is figured in similar ways, making use of anaphora, epanalepsis, and rhetorical questions. A story may begin, "There is a city called...." Numerals in the first class are increased by one in the second ("seven years were completed, eight revolutions of time"). Peoples say "Ooh" and "Ah." Hymns and prayers present similar imagery. The power of divinities is cosmic in extent. The king of the gods assigns powers to lesser gods. A god increases or decreases "as he wishes." Prayers begin with the god's name in the vocative. The god is asked to come to the suppliant's side. Requests of certain kinds follow a certain order. Past benefits are recorded. Some prayers issue blank checks, for anything desirable.
Chapter 6, "Hesiod," takes up an author about which W. can be said to be the world's leading expert (although he still insists that Hesiod is older than Homer). About the Eastern background to Hesiod there has been long agreement. The Succession Myth of the Theogony, whereby one generation of gods replaces another, appears to have originated in the Near East. W. summarizes Hesiod's account, then those of the Hurro-Hittite story of Kumarbi and draws astute points of comparison. He does the same with the Babylonian Enuma elish and the so-called Phoenician History of Sanchuniathion, a Hadrianic work that preserves genuine Phoenician tradition.
Henceforth W. goes through the Theogony systematically. Hesiod receives his gift of song from the Muses; even so do Eastern scribes receive messages in dreams. Sky mates with Earth, but this nearly universal motif could come from anywhere, W. admits. Iapetos looks like Japheth, but there the similarity ends. Eastern Ea and Greek Kronos each take the initiative when the other gods cower in fear. For Hesiod, the castration of Ouranos is the separation of heaven and earth, but castration in the Hurro-Hittite myth of Kumarbi does not seem to have the same meaning. Aphrodite, sprung from the genitals of Ouranos, looks like the Phoenician Astarte, called Queen of Heaven. The odd Greek god Oath has a close Assyrian parallel. Hesiod's hymn to Hecate has close parallels in Babylonian hymns. At Delphi could be seen the stone that Kronos swallowed; it was called baidylos, from the Semitic "house of God" like the stone on which Jacob slept. In the Ugaritic Baal epic, and in Hesiod, a divine craftsman makes weapons for the storm god. Prometheus and Ea, crafty gods each, help mankind against a persecuting senior god. Atlas bears resemblance to the Hurro-Hittite monster Ubelluri and to Ullikummi, a stone monster that grows from Ubelluri's shoulder.
In the Greek theomachy, descriptions of battle parallel Eastern ones, including the image of a horde of weapons blocking the sky. Titans are like the Hittite "Former Gods," who too were imprisoned in the underworld, sometimes, like the Titans, twelve in number. Typhon seems to be derived from the Ugaritic Sapon, god of Mount Casius north of Ugarit; Sapon was equivalent to the storm god Baal, but an early story may have told how Baal imprisoned Sapon in the mountain. Certainly an ancient Eastern story told of a god's war against a many-headed serpent; Typhoeus was the monster with the hundred heads, whom in one version Zeus defeated on Mount Casius. After his victory Zeus assigned the gods their offices, just as in Eastern parallels.
Of course Works and Days belongs to the ancient Eastern genre of wisdom literature wherein a wise or prophetic teacher admonishes errant rulers, or a relative. Many of Hesiod's apothegms have strong Eastern parallels, for example the admonishment to labor and the need to avoid idleness. The Prometheus myth's explanation of sacrificial practice has Eastern precedents, as does Zeus's gleeful prediction of disaster when deceived. Many deities, as often in the East, work to make a creature, Pandora; her jar may reflect Hittite incantation ritual. Parallels to the certainly non-Greek myths of the five races have long been noticed in Iran and Judea, including specific features: long-life, good weather, and a single language for the Golden Age, followed by short-life and a breakdown of family and virtue in the last age. The folktale of the hawk and nightingale is not attested specifically in the East, but animal fable is part of the genre of wisdom literature from the earliest times. The promise of good times to follow on righteous behavior is paralleled closely by Yahweh's instructions to Moses on Mount Sinai, as are similar Hesiodic moral precepts by other Eastern sources, as well as Hesiod's hemerology and bird-omens.
W. begins Chapter 7, "The Iliad", with a comparison between the Greek hero Achilles, anomalous in many ways, with Gilgamesh. Each has a divine mother important to the action, who intercedes with the other gods on her son's behalf; each hero is impulsive and emotional; each has a close friend who dies, prompting a railing against mortality, followed by an acceptance of it. W. then gathers interesting detailed comparanda between Ninsun (Gilgamesh' divine mother) and Thetis; similarities to Patroclus' sortie, the kinds of lamentations held over Patroclus' body, and especially details of the ghostly appearance to Patroclus, so like that of Enkidu to Gilgamesh. Priam's meeting with Achilles is in some ways similar to Gilgamesh's meeting with Utnapishtim.
The rest of the long chapter is devoted to a detailed and manifold catalogue of incidents, motifs, and expressions in the Iliad that appear to have Near Eastern antecedents. For example, the gods leaping to their feet at an assembly, advice to yield to the storm god when he is angry, the houses and sleep of the gods, the false dream before a battle, the portent of a snake turned to stone, the use of messengers for transmitting instructions, flies gathering around milk pails, the breaking of a truce, a god who grows sky-high, a god's imprisonment in a jar, gods who give mighty war shouts, humans who come and go like leaves on the trees, the Chimaera, wise never to have been born, armor hung in a temple as booty, the weak isolated hero who kills a giant, making love to one's father's concubine, picturesque personifications; drops of blood from the sky; a hero-sized cup; a wall destroyed by flood, a magic staff, seduction by the sex goddess, images of cows protecting calves, speech that is sweeter than honey, animals that prophesy, the scale of fate, peace between lions and men, and many more.
Chapter 8, "The Odyssey," follows the same method. Odysseus, who prefers cunning to brute face-off, is no Gilgamesh but in his adventures sometimes has similar experiences. Both heroes are said in a prologue to have traveled widely and to have gained knowledge thereby. The strange Circe and Calypso, friendly goddesses in remote parts, are like the ale-wife Siduri who meets Gilgamesh at the edge of the waters. The Greek island of Aiaia, where Circe daughter of Helios lives, is evidently traceable to the Babylonian goddess Aya, wife of the sun-god and goddess of sexual love. Circe's very name, "hawk," may be connected with the hawk-headed sun-god of Egypt, exported to Phoenicia. Circe otherwise resembles Ishtar, with her competence over transforming drugs and wild animals. The Mesopotamian poem about Nergal and Ereshkigal show Nergal bullying Ereshkigal as Odysseus does Circe, with similar results. Each goddess gives advice about crossing the dangerous waters of death to consult with a prophet. Calypso, "the veiled one," reminds us that Siduri too is veiled, and both goddesses send heroes into the woods to cut timber for a sea journey. Calypso's list of men punished through a goddess's love sounds like Ishtar's complaint when Gilgamesh spurns her. Her offer of immortality to Odysseus reminds us that Gilgamesh, in his journey across the waters, sought just that.
The never-never land of the Phaeacians has much in common with the land of Utnapishtim, as Odysseus' savage appearance before Nausicaa echoes Gilgamesh's appearance before Siduri. The theme of the naked unkempt man who is clothed and taken to the city, as Nausicaa takes Odysseus to town, parallels the harlot's taming of Enkidu by the waterhole. Returning from Aeolus' island, Odysseus falls asleep and loses Ithaca, just as Gilgamesh cannot remain awake outside the house of Utnapishtim. Numerous similarities tie the Odyssean Nekuia with the poem Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Underworld, including the man who died by falling off a roof. As Odysseus' men perish when they kill the cattle of the sun, so does Enkidu die after he and Gilgamesh kill the bull of heaven, and in both cases a god threatens to invert the upper and lower worlds unless the god's will prevails.
In the remainder of the chapter W. presents a catalogue of incidents and passages with possible Near Eastern antecedents: Menelaus' fathering of a child on a concubine; the splendor of Alcinous' palace; Menelaus' transportation to a paradise at the ends of the earth; Penelope's refusal to eat; the four streams of water on Calypso's island; Calypso's special food of ambrosia and nectar; the simile of the wind and the chaff; Nausicaa compared to a date palm; the metal dogs before the palace of Alcinous; the disappearance of the island of the Phaeacians; the spurned sacrifice; the use of protective plants (moly); Odysseus' necromancy on the shores of Ocean; the name of the Sirens; the suitors' reluctance to kill one of royal stock; Penelope's bed, covered with tears; the punishment by amputation of ears and nose; the radiance surrounding a divinity; birth "from oak or stone"; the bow that only the hero can draw; the archery contest; a suitor's hurling of a leg of beef at Odysseus; Laertes' fainting at reunion with Odysseus. In conclusion, W. notes how twice as many Eastern poetic motifs are found in the Iliad as in the Odyssey, and that those parallels to the Iliad belong to the early parts of the Gilgamesh story, as those parallel to the Odyssey are modeled on wanderings after the death of Enkidu.
In Chapter 9, "Myths and Legends of Heroes," W. discusses Near Eastern elements in Greek literature of the archaic period. Some such features are folktale motifs, for example the foundling; the magic hair that ensures power or security; the twin brothers who fight in the womb; the man who is thrown from a ship and rescued by a fish; the person who escapes pursuit by praying to a god and being changed into something else; and the hasty oath, like the one Jephthah made to Yahweh. From the story of Io we find such familiar Eastern themes as the celestial god's love for a heifer, attested in Akkadian, Hurro-Hittite, and Ugaritic myth. Epaphos, son of Io and Zeus, is evidently the Egyptian bull-god Apis, while Belos, Arabos, Nilos, and Libya have obvious Eastern origins. The strange story of the fifty sons of Aegyptos and the fifty sons of Danaos has a near parallel in a Hittite myth.
W.'s discussion of the Kadmos myth is especially strong, and he builds a cogent model for the name Kadmeioi (whence Kadmos) as coming from the Semitic "men of eld," an iron-age description of the inhabitants of the Theban acropolis, and even the name of Harmonia may derive from Semitic for "fortress," the Kadmeia. Asterios, who married Europa, he derives from Semitic Astarte, the male form, so that the story of their marriage may derive from a sacred union of bull and cow.
Among Argive myths, the odd leprosy that strikes the Proetids is common in the Near East. The Gorgo's head has long been connected with representations of Humbaba, whose glance too could bring death; kibisis, Perseus' pouch, seems to be a Semitic word. Turning to the myths of Thebes, W. picks up W. Burkert's speculative attachment of the myth of the seven to an Eastern rite of exorcism, in which seven demons are expelled.
The myths of Heracles seem almost entirely Eastern in origin: the story of his birth, so like Egyptian propaganda for the birth of pharaoh in the New Kingdom; his being cheated of his birthright, as was Esau by Jacob; his strangling of serpents, illustrated on Eastern seals. Most of the exploits find Eastern parallels, sometimes very close (the lion combat, the seven-headed hydra, the golden apples of the Hesperides), and are especially reminiscent of the adventures of Samson, who like Heracles killed a lion with his bare hands and was undone by a woman. The very notion of a cycle of labors is Eastern too, reminiscent of the eleven labors of the hero Ninurta.
Stories of the Tantalids show tantalizing similarities with Hittite myths, appropriate because Lydia, whence came Pelops, is in the cultural sphere of the Hittites of central Anatolia. The name of Myrtilus, Pelops' charioteer, sounds like Mursili, name of three Hittite kings, and Tantalus' name too may be Hittite. The backwards course of the sun in the struggle between Atreus and Thyestes for the throne of Mycenae is easily paralleled from the reign of Hezekiah.
Phaethon looks a lot like Eastern gods who fell from heaven (including Lucifer). A bird carried Ganymede to heaven, as an eagle cared Mesopotamian Etana there. The Golden Fleece of the Argonautica looks like the holy fleece common in Hittite rite.
From the Trojan cycle, Zeus' desire to alleviate an overpopulated earth appears in the Mesopotamian story of Atrahasis, telling of the Flood. Peleus' struggle with Thetis looks like Jacob's struggle with an angel, probably in origin a river spirit, and the motif of the wedding which the gods attended appears also in the Ugaritic Keret epic. Odysseus' feigned madness to avoid the draft looks like the madness of David on the run from Saul. The extraordinary self-immolation of Ajax is paralleled by Saul's falling on his sword, as Philoctetes' special bow, and narrative role, also appear in the East. The theft of the Palladion is like that of the statue of Marduk, stolen and restolen over a period of 800 years. Enlil's statue flashes and moves of its own accord, as does the Palladion. The wooden horse looks like an Assyrian siege engine, both in design and function. The mission of Menelaus and Odysseus to Troy, where Antenor, later spared, protects them, looks like that of Joshua's spies into Jericho, where a prostitute, later spared, protects them.
The flood story is unknown to Hesiod and, except in disguised form, to Homer, but comes to Greece perhaps in the sixth century B.C. Its similarities to Eastern versions, both in general theme and in specific detail, have long been noticed, and there can be no question of its origin. If it does come to Greece only in the archaic age, there is clear evidence for the continuation of the transmission of culture from the late Iron Age, at least, into the classical period: transmission did not take place all at one time.
Chapter 10, devoted to the The Lyric Poets, reviews elements of all kinds in the poets of the Archaic period, to find various phrases, sentiments, or rhetorical postures common also in Eastern literatures. W. fixes on social institutions such as that of the scurrilous commentator, found in Mesopotamia as well as on Paros. He finds arresting parallels in the East for the licentious women important to the poetry of Archilochus, as well as fellatio, performed against a temple wall, compared to sucking beer through a tube. Such proverbial statements as "nothing surprises me any more" are Eastern in origin too, as are animal fables and their morals.
He finds verbal echoes in Callinus and Mimnermus of Eastern poetry, and Solon's moral maxims belong to Eastern wisdom literature. Even the social tension in Theognis, and the fear of the rising lower class, is closely paralleled by older Semitic models. In the Melic poets, "dream-like" to mean "fine" is Eastern. In an interesting discussion, he shows how Sappho consistently takes imagery generated in an Eastern religious context then secularizes it and applies it to love. Antiphony in Sappho appears to be Eastern, and she is our oldest testimony to the Eastern cult of Adonis. W. notes other similarities in Stesichorus, Ibycus, Anacreon, Simonides, Pindar, and Bacchylides.
Chapter 11 is given to Aeschylus. W. goes through each play systematically. From the Persai he notices an odd use of "lord," very like a Semitic idiom, the motif of the royal person worried by a dream, and certain features of Assyrian cult practice. The raising of the ghost of Darius looks like the witch of Endor, and the series of rhetorical questions meaning, "Where are they now?" reflect Eastern convention.
The Supplices offers a clear imitation of divine titles and epithets for Zeus earlier applied to Baal. Also here we find the Eastern metaphor the "tablets of the heart." So are scepter and throne coupled, and the Danaids, as in Akkadian prayers, wish to turn into smoke and escape. Victories are awarded by divine judgment.
Various phrases and images of divine power in the Agamemnon, including the net, have good Eastern parallels. So do "panegyric metaphor-strings," where a potentate is praised by a list of bold metaphors. From other plays he gathers such parallels as calling the sun "the lamp of the gods." W. does not regard the Prometheus as composed by Aeschylus, but perhaps by his son. Its debt to Eastern models is, however, deep, including the notion that humans once lived in primitive conditions and the cosmic cataclysm that closes the play. The traditions that W. has been tracing appear to dry up after Aeschylus, when Greek writers grow away from habits of their Eastern forebears to fashion new styles of expression.
Chapter 12, "The Question of Transmission," addresses the extremely complex question of just how Eastern traditions might have passed to Greece. W. identifies two historical periods in which such transmission was likely to have taken place, in the Late Bronze Age and in the eighth and seventh centuries B.C. The question of transmission is of course intimately bound up with writing and how writing was used and by whom. In the East, writing was in the hands of a scribal class, whereas in Greece amateurs could write. Eastern scribes were always biliterate or bilingual, whereas in Greece they never were. The relation between oral performance and transmission is especially tangled. From hints here and there we can conclude that Eastern singers were not, in general, literate, but learned their songs from written texts, read aloud by scribes. The style of Eastern literary texts leaves no doubt that they were sometimes intended to be heard as song; the enormously repetitive style only makes sense on this assumption. Sometimes colophons indicate that an Eastern text is to be accompanied by this or that musical instrument. We hear of a professional singer called naru, evidently something like the Greek aoidos. Dictation of poetic texts does not seem likely for the cuneiform tradition, but far more likely for the West Semitic one, whence the Greek descended directly. Certainly the Ugaritic poems were meant to support oral performance in some way. The scribe of the Baal epic even signed his work, which he may have taken down by dictation (just as the Homeric poems were recorded).
Still, we cannot expect transmission of the cultural artifacts described in this book to have taken place through written means. The ethnically mixed populations of north Syria, Cyprus, Crete, Sicily, and southern Italy must have produced many bilingual speakers of Semitic and Greek, and some of these must have been singers. We know of the presence of interpreters at all times to serve the international community of traders and travelers, and much other intermingling was brought about through war, mercenary service, and colonization. Assyrian aggression beginning in the ninth century B.C. surely drove the Phoenician expansion in the Western Mediterranean, and into various Greek lands. At the hands of the immigrant bilingual poet we must place responsibility for the transmission of culture from East to West.
This is an extraordinary book, rich in deep learning, astute insight, and pellucid argument to support a radical thesis. I was happy to be persuaded, because I have long felt that something like this must have happened; but we can only admire the thoroughness and sobriety by which W. makes his argument. Every classicist should read this book, one of the most important in the last generation.
 
....
 

Monday, October 7, 2013

The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation


 
 
[The AMAIC would argue more for Western appropriation of Middle Eastern,
rather than Oriental Chinese, with the latter, too, being something of a beneficiary] 



http://worldhistoryconnected.press.illinois.edu/2.2/br_weston.html

Book Review


Hobson, John M. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation (Cambridge University Press, 2004). 376 pp, $29.99.

In The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation, John M. Hobson has written a provocative work in keeping with the irreverent tradition of his great-grandfather, the well-known British economist and journalist John A. Hobson (1858-1940). The elder Hobson, a highly controversial figure in his day whose work has gained much respect since his death, pioneered economic theories later developed by John Maynard Keynes. In addition, his 1902 study Imperialism, where he traced the origins of imperialism to capitalism, anticipated ideas typically identified with the Russian revolutionary leader Vladimir Lenin. In The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation John M. Hobson builds on the by-now plentiful work by scholars who have studied the contributions of non-Western societies to the making of the modern world. He presents a polemical historical narrative that turns conventional thinking on its head by making the following argument: the rise of the West to global dominance in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is best understood as an instance of late development, dependent on extensive borrowing from the non-Western world, rather than as an instance of autonomous, internally-generated transformation. 1
There is hardly any original research presented in The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Instead, Hobson, who is Reader in Politics and International Relations at the University of Sheffield, makes his case by piecing together scholarly findings from a wide range of historical sub-fields. Anyone seeking titles related to the theme of world history would be well advised to consult Hobson's footnotes (unfortunately, the book does not contain a bibliography). Hobson's contribution therefore does not lay in the presentation of new knowledge but instead in the offering of a compelling, synthetic historiographical essay that challenges readers to rethink historical ideas that have achieved virtual orthodox standing among scholars and lay people alike. 2
Although his book is in places dense (and repetitive), Hobson's argument is straightforward and simple to grasp. He contends that Western Europeans did not invent the modern capitalist world wholesale beginning with the Renaissance, and that globalization did not begin in 1500. Indeed, Hobson argues that such ideas are simply powerful "myths" that have been perpetuated by Eurocentric thinkers. By contrast, he argues that well before 1500 other societies—primarily Chinese and Middle Eastern, and to a lesser extent African—pioneered virtually all of the major innovations that, combined, make up the foundations of the modern world order usually credited to the West. These innovations range from technological inventions to political and economic ones, and the main line of Hobson's argument is that absent the diffusion of non-Western ideas and practices into Europe the Western part of that "continent" would not have been positioned to take off in the early modern and modern periods. 3
Hobson first discusses what he terms "oriental globalisation," a dramatic, transformative process that began with the advent of Islam in the seventh century and eventually linked a series of great empires (the Tang, Ummayad/Abbasid, and Fatimid) into the largest and most culturally and economically interconnected network of advanced societies in world history to date. Key here is Hobson's argument that Islam, far from being a regressive religion that blocked the development of capitalist institutions, in fact promoted such development owing to the Koran's emphasis on the importance of investment as well as to Muslim society's general acceptance of the important social and economic role played by merchants. These characteristics prompted Muslims to spread outward in all directions in pursuit of trade, thereby making the Middle East the most advanced and cosmopolitan region of the globe and what Hobson calls the "Bridge of the World." 4
According to Hobson, China dominated the next phase of globalization. He asserts that Song China witnessed the "first great industrial miracle," which he calls the "single most important event in the history of global intensive power between 1100 and 1800." (p. 51) The transformation of Chinese society took place in many fields and included innovations in the iron and steel industry, the invention of paper money and the printing press, new agricultural methods, important leaps forward in navigational technologies, and a wide variety of military advances. Furthermore, Hobson argues that Chinese commerce was highly developed and that China did not withdraw from the global economy in the fifteenth century, as is often claimed, but in fact maintained its position as the most advanced society in the world into the nineteenth century. Hobson also argues that Japan and India played critically important and dynamic roles in the pre-nineteenth century world economy, and that none of the major players in the world economy before 1800 was European. 5
Given all this, Hobson recognizes that he must account for the West's rise to a position of global dominance beginning in the nineteenth century. While arguing that Western Europe could never have moved ahead had it not had the advantage of being a late developer that could integrate technologies developed elsewhere, Hobson points out that the West did display agency that played a critical role in its rise to power. However, the agency that the West displayed was mostly of a negative type, according to Hobson, who also stresses that the very idea of Europe itself only came into being within a global context in the middle ages owing to the challenge posed by Muslims, who forced Europeans to define themselves in contradistinction to the Islamic Middle East. Hobson expands on this idea of European self-understanding in chapters on the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Here he posits that Europe's most important invention was in the realm of ideas, and consisted of racist thinking, a form of thought that divided the world's peoples and civilizations into hierarchies of development and relative value. Those peoples not deemed to be civilized were in need of Europe's civilizing help, which of course took the form of imperialism and colonialism in many parts of the world.6
For Hobson imperialism was not only a morally repugnant "moral vocation," it also helped account for the rise of the West by providing European powers—especially the British—with raw materials and markets for their goods. Hobson makes this point in the context of a broader discussion in which he sets out to demolish "the myth" of laissez-faire as the key to Great Britain's industrial revolution and economic take off. Once more inverting the standard line or argument, he refers to Great Britain as a despotic, interventionist state, and argues that the economic advantage over the rest of the world it achieved in the nineteenth century resulted from massive state spending, extensive state regulation of the economy, regressive taxation, and trade protectionism. More generally, Hobson contends that "without the plundering and exploitation of Eastern [and other] resources—land, labour, and markets—Europe would have failed to break through into industrial modernity." (p. 312)7
In conclusion, Hobson calls for an account of historical global development that is temporally relativist and that does not ascribe as permanent characteristics to Europe features that only came into being in the late modern and modern periods. Rather than viewing Europe's rise in the modern era as inevitable or wholly based on European developments, Hobson points out that "the East enjoyed the lead in both global intensive and extensive power between 500 and 1800 before the pendulum finally swung to the West in the nineteenth century." (p. 299) Only by abandoning a Eurocentric perspective, and by comprehending the many phases of the global economy and world system prior to the rise of modern Europe, as well as Europe's indebtedness to those earlier phases, does it become possible to recognize that the modern world is the product not merely of European advances, but of complex interactions across global regions and across time. For Hobson, modern Europe only makes sense and can only be understood in the context of a temporally broad, global history. 8
In the main, Hobson presents a coherent and challenging historical narrative that will force scholars interested in these questions to think in novel ways and to search in new places, and I am largely sympathetic to his project. Hobson is certainly not the first to point out that globalization is neither an exclusively modern nor a primarily Western-driven phenomenon, but he has combined that observation with an emphasis on the diffusion to Europe of non-Western technologies and attention to the role of racist thinking and imperialism in the making of the modern West that serves to place the most recent wave of globalization in a new light. 9
At the same time, I found Hobson's treatment of Europe to be highly selective. While he attributes agency to the West, the only agency he affords it is, as already stated, a negative kind, as though the rise of the modern West in relation to other societies can be explained by racism and imperialism alone. Perhaps Hobson believes that others have written enough about the positive reasons for the rise of the West in the modern era to feel that all that is left to him is to point out some of the problems with their accounts? In any case, his book would likely find a wider audience were he to devote at least as much time and energy to explaining the wide range of values and intellectual forces that combined to create the modern West as he does to the subjects of racism and imperialism. Hobson is not wrong to emphasize those subjects; however, in reading him I felt that his desire to rebut Eurocentric scholarship (and scholars) perhaps overwhelmed his ability to write a fully balanced account.10
Timothy Weston
University of Colorado, Boulder


From: http://books.google.com.au/books/about/The_Eastern_Origins_of_Western_Civilisat.html?id=KQN85hrJyT4C&redir_esc=y


John M. Hobson
Cambridge University Press, 03/06/2004 - History - 376 pages
 
This book challenges the ethnocentric bias of mainstream accounts of the 'Rise of the West'. John Hobson argues that these accounts assume that Europeans have pioneered their own development, and that the East has been a passive by-stander. In contrast Hobson describes the rise of what he calls the 'Oriental West'. He argues that Europe first assimilated many Eastern inventions, and then appropriated Eastern resources through imperialism. Hobson's book thus propels the hitherto marginalised Eastern peoples to the forefront of the story of progressive world history.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Possible Hindu Appropriations of Middle Eastern Legends


Cattle:  Cow, Bull & Calf
SEARCH     Home     Site Map     Calendar     Karmapa     News    DONATE
 


Wish-fulfilling Cow

Cows represent the All-good.  The image of fruits of nature emerging from a cow's horn -- a horn of plenty -- is tied to the Cow of Plenty of Indian mythology, whose name is Surabhi.  She belonged to the Vedic sage, Vasishtha.
Kamadhenu is the sacred cow as she relates to Hindu ritual.  Her 5 gifts are sacred offerings.  They are:  milk, curds (yoghurt,)  butter, urine (considered a pure substance that can serve as medicine,) and manure (which is used for plastering walls and floors, and which, dried, is used as fuel.)   She also gives us a further gift, her offspring -- a calf, the source of further cattle.
In the Himalayan tradition, butter is sculpted to make offerings such as tormas, and it also provides the oil that fuels butterlamps.  
Ghee, clarified butter, is the very essence of cow.  As such, it is the substance that, in India, is used to bath sacred images. 
Classification of Chinese Buddhist scripture  (p'an-chiao) owes a debt to Chih-i (538-597), who thought Dharma could be understood in terms of successive stages of refinement, similar to the way ghee is produced from milk:
Just as milk derives from a cow, cream derives from milk, butter derives from cream, melted butter derives from butter, and ghee derives from melted butter, so the twelve divisions of the canon derive from the Buddha, the sutras derive from the twelve divisions of the canon, the extended sutras derive from the sutras, the Perfection of Wisdom derives from the extended sutras, and nirvana, which is like ghee, derives from the Perfection of Wisdom.   ~ Quoted by Peter Gregory.
Hindu deity, Lord Vishnu, in his avatar or active form as Krishna, is called Govinda and Gopala: "the cow-finder" and "cow-protector."  These epithets are references to his existence in Vrindavan as a herdsman.  This is metaphorical in the same way that King David (The Bible: Old Testament. Psalm 23) sang, "The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want."  From the viewpoint of a devotee of Krishna the Cowherd, the cosmic cow is seen as incorporating all deities.

Cow = Wealth  

The Maasai of East Africa, who live off the milk and blood of their prized cattle are frequently heard to make the claim that all the world's cattle actually belong to them.  If that is so, then they once were rich beyond belief, for there is evidence to show that cows were the world's first "portable" wealth.
Once, the world was divided into those who kept wealth in the form of cattle, and those who did not.   Herders of sheep and goats were considered by the cattle-rich, as somewhat inferior.  On the other hand, the Greeks and the Romans looked down on all those who used butter instead of olive or other vegetable oil.
The English word chattel meaning possessions derives from capital ( < caput = head.)  It further evolved into cattle, the collective word for cow.  In other words, especially in lands where the Romans left their imprint, cattle means wealth.  And in many other cultures, besides.
There is a motif in the mythology of the world known as "cattle-raiding."  In classical mythology, Hermes the Trickster steals the cattle of the sun.  One of the most famous Irish tales (c. 1100 CE) is The Cattle Raid of Cooley (Táin Bó Cúalnge). [Link to the finale in which the brown Bull of Cualaigne appears.  No longer  available.]

Heavenly Cow

 In Indian folktales, Dhol is the name of a white cow that holds the earth between her horns.  And we know  the Indian cow has been protected for millennia for the economic reasons this symbolism expresses.  A less direct symbolism is expressed by the fact that the white cow is "the vehicle" of Goddess Parvati.
In ancient Egypt, there were a number of cow deities.  Nut, the sky goddess emanates as Mehueret, the Flood.  Another is Hesat and milk was referred to as "beer of Hesat.'"   The Egyptian goddess of fertility, Bata, was depicted as a cow, or as a human with the ears and horns of a cow.  She was a deity of Upper Egypt (Sudan.)  Even today, that part of the world has a special relationship with cows.  The Masai of East Africa consider that all the cattle in the world belong to them.
Cow-horned Hathor, daughter of Ra, is another Egyptian goddess associated with the heavens.   The Celestial Cow, who carries the sun's disc between her horns, she is later portrayed as a slender woman wearing the horns.  As "Eye of Ra" she transforms into avenging Sekhmet -- lion-headed death deity, goddess of war and pestilence -- to punish humans for their  transgressions.  She nearly wipes out all mankind before Ra manages to arrest her activity by getting her drunk with beer that had been colored to look like blood so that she once again becomes benevolent.

Europe

Europa was a once a Phoenician maiden whom Zeus desired.  Jealous Hera turned her into a white cow and chased her towards the west, the region that today bears her name.
Indo-europeans carried the notion of a cosmic cow with them to northern Europe, for in the mythology of the Eddas, Audhumla ("Without Impurity") was the creator of humankind.  From a stone, she licked Man into being over a period of three days.  She was created from ice-melt at the beginning of time, and preserves herself while sustaining the status quo by licking the salt and hoar frost which would otherwise build up on Niflheim, abode of the gods.  The titans or Ymir feed on her milk.
In southern Gaul, Damona was the name of this cow who exists in relation to the waters of the earth. The ultimate food was the milk of such a cow.  Ethne is an Irish goddess, who subsists on milk from a sacred cow.
The Basques had a special relation with the cow. They used to worship Mari at her sacred caves or "houses of Mari."  It is believed that her guardian, a fiery-eyed, red-haired cow (or bull?) Beigorri, may occasionally be seen there still.  It is this animal that is painted on the walls of the sacred caves, many of which contain evidence of occupation from over 20,000 years ago.

Is it a cow or not?

There seems to be a definite idea as to what constitutes Cow that is rather different from the vague categorization of  deer / antelope /gazelle.  Cows are definitely not water buffalo nor are they yaks.  The Hindu Goddess Durga slew a primordial demon Mahisha, who had at first taken the form of a huge water buffalo but the bull, Nandi is the vehicle of, and hence all bulls are sacred to, her consort, Maheshvara or Shiva.   Though people cannot deny there is a relation here, the distinction between buffalo and bull is considered very important.  Many people who would never eat roast beef will eat "buff burger".
The sub-family of even-toed mammals known as Bovines is separated into several Genus.
1. Bos are true cattle, descended from the ancestor of the European cow known as the Aurochs (Bos primigenius.) There are 3 species:
Bos taurus, European cattle; Bos indicus, tropical cattle; and Bos frontalis, Bhutan cattle.
2. Bison is particular to North America, "American bison."
3. Poephagus is the yak.
4. Bibos is the guar (wild buffalo of India.)
5. Bubalus is the [east Asian] water buffalo, sub-divided into River and Swamp types.
6.  Anoa is a small-size variety, now classed with Bubalus.
7.  Syncerus is the impressive African or Cape buffalo.

Chromosomal studies and field experiments show that Bos, Bison and Poephagus will cross-breed, but not with Bubalus or Syncerus.
~ National Research Council report.  The Water Buffalo: New Prospects for an Under Utilized Animal. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1981.

The Yak

For Tibetans who live in mountainous terrain, we can say that the yak [a male term, actually] is their cow.
"The nomads call their animals "wish-granting yaks," for they provide all their needs - - hides and wool for warmth and shelter, meat and milk products for food, and even dried dung for fuel."  Inextricably linked to the fortunes of Tibet, the yak may go a long way to help preserve her culture* -- no pun intended.
*Yogurt or curd need some culture from a previous batch that contains an essential lactophile bacteria.
Greatest Places says:
The yak is a hefty, primitive looking beast, somewhat resembling the ancient paintings of bisons. The high plateau is the natural ecological niche for this unique animal, which flourished best at heights above 13,000 feet. Below this altitude, there is a similar, though less powerful animal, the dzo, which is actually a crossbreed between a yak and a cow.  Strong enough to do heavy field tasks, yaks also supply their owners with milk, butter, meat, dung, and hair. Apparently the value of yak dung in the woodless regions of Central Asia cannot be over estimated. It is the main fuel of the country and burns with a hot, steady flame. Yet in 1994, 10, 000 were established in reserves by the current authorities, along with the always rare moose-like takin.
A dri is the female yak.
The Dalai Lama has been quoted as saying that mixing Buddhism and Christianity is like "trying to put a yak's head on a cow's body."  This kind of reference to the cow in discussions of religion/philosophy is a very ancient one in the Indian tradition.   Even a thousand years ago, when the Nyaya metaphysicians disputed Buddhists about matters of ontology [being-ness/existence] they referred to  "eternal cow-ness" as being distinct from "bovine particulars."

Wordplay

Cattle (kine is an archaic English word) are grouped into herds that consist of cows, heifers and calves.  To control breeding, bulls are kept apart.  Steers are castrated bulls that are raised for meat.  Non-agricultural people do not seem to know what an ox is, nor the relation between oxen and steers.  An ox is a powerful draught animal and a young one is known as a bullock.
The flat wildflower with a yellow centre is called an ox-eye daisy, and a person who is gazing longingly at a loved one is said to be "making calf eyes."
Bovine is an adjective derived from the Latin bos.  Yes, boss.
Gentle
The cow epitomized gentleness and appears in The Bible as the opposite of the fierce predators. Isaiah XI, 6-7:
The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them,  7. And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together, and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.

The Bull

Taurus is today the second constellation in the Western hemisphere, in the spring.  Many different cultures have seen the red-eyed bust of a bull in the arrangement of stars, and the notion of a Bull of Heaven is very ancient.

In a way, it is the opposite of the heavenly cow, for in  Mesopotamian myth, it was the embodiment of a terrible drought created by Anu for the goddess Ishtar.
The Mediterranean island of Crete was the legendary home of the Minotaur -- a bull-headed monster according to the Greeks, but archaeologists of the 19th century revealed a misunderstanding.  Ancient Cretan culture is called Minoan after Minos, the legendary ruler of the island.  The largest building on the site was found by Sir Arthur Evans to be extremely complex in its layout -- a veritable maze.   Add to these two facts the discovery of the emblem of the Minoans, a double-headed axe or labrys (not unlike a flattened dorje) that was found carved into stone pillars and we have a Laby-rinth and a Mino-taur.
The Minoans did have a sacred relationship with the bull, and bull-leaping youths depicted on the walls of the palace at Knossos indicate some elaborate ritual associated with it.  This involved dancing or tumbling between the sharp horns of unrestrained bulls.  Horned altar stones similar to contemporary abstract sculptural pieces were also found there.  
Sadly, other aspects of this seem to have a root in reality.  Legend has it that offerings of youths were made regularly to the Minotaur, and indeed human remains were recently found that indicate the intentional butchering of human beings.
As a punishment for murder, the step-child of Hera [Hera-cles] was condemned to a series of trials or labours by King Eurystheus,.  The seventh was to capture the fierce marauding bull of Crete who some say was Zeus himself in his role as the shape-shifting trickster that carried off the Phoenician maiden, Europa.  It is more likely that the ferocious beast had been the animal lover of the queen of Crete, for when King Minos insulted Poseidon, that god avenged himself by inducing in the Queen , a near-deadly lust for a bull.
According to the Greeks, this relation engendered the Minotaur, a bull-headed monster who was kept in a "labyrinth" and to whom the youths of the land were sacrificed.

Later, Herakles made a lasso, and chasing the beast until it weakened, finally succeeding in throwing the lasso over the bull's head.  Having pacified the beast, Heracles leapt on its back and rode it across the sea back to the Peloponese.  He presented it to Eurystheus, who thought to sacrifice it to Hera, queen of heaven.  But Hera continued to bear a grudge against the hero who, through no fault of his was the offspring of her husband Zeus and the earthly woman Alcmene.  She refused the offering, and so the bull was released to run wild in Greece.
While serving in Persia, the Romans encountered the cult of Mithras, Sol Invictis, Mithras stabbing the Bull of Darkness.vanquisher of the Bull, and that religion became exceedingly popular among legionnaires of the Empire stationed everywhere.
They prayed, "Spirit of Spirit, if it be your will, lend me immortal life so that I may be reborn, and the sacred spirit breathe in me again."
Greek carving (3rd century CE)  of Mithras Tauroctonos.
Mithras vanquishing the Bull of Darkness with his dagger, though originally a Persian image, became characteristically Roman. 
Mithraism vied in popularity with Christianity to the extent that several of the important aspects of its mythology were assimilated to Christianity by the late 4th century.  One of these is the important date of 25th December, the winter solstice which marks the birth of the Lord of Light, who is essentially a solar deity.  It was customary to mark the day with gift-giving.  Mithras can also be said to have been born of a virgin, and to have lived among shepherds.   His priests were the Magi.
  • An excellent description of bullfighting and its lifestyle appears in a collection of articles by Susan Orlean about extraordinary people called The Bullfighter Checks Her Makeup.  The title chapter is about matadora Cristina Sanchez.  (Reprinted by Doubleday, 2001.) 

Shiva

Nandi means joyous.  Nandi the Bull is the vahana (vehicle) of Shiva. However in ancient times, there was worshipped the Lord of Joy (Nandikeshvara), who was depicted as a man with a bull's head.
The bull is also the emblem of Adinath, the first Jain tirthankara.
In South India, on the north shore of the Cauvery, is the Hindu temple called Vallalar Koil that is sacred to Shiva as Sri Vadhanyeshwar.  At this shrine, Parvati his consort is called Gnanambika (Wisdom Mother.)  At this place is the shrine of a yogi, Sri Medha Dakshinamurti.  He is depicted under a banyan tree but somewhat surprisingly he is seated on Nandi, Shiva's bull. 
The bull, a symbol of male sexuality, is the driving force of attainment in many symbolic systems.  Consider Zeus, sky god of the Greeks who, in the form of a white bull, unrelentingly pursues Europa.  It may be that the prototype of that myth is the Indian cosmogony in which the First Being, Purusha, out of loneliness, splits into two aspects, male and female.  The female, aware that the two are brother and sister, out of shame assumes the form of a cow and flees her brother's advances.  Accordingly, he becomes a bull, so she eludes him by becoming a mare.  No matter what form she assumes, he changes to correspond, and so all the various animals of creation are born.
Arrogance
According to legend, Vrishabha Deva (Nandi) was getting too proud of the fact that he was the one who carried the Great God.  Shiva wanted to teach him a lesson, so he placed a lock from his matted hair on the bull. Unable to bear the weight, Rishaba Deva felt humbled and realized his mistake. He prostrated before Lord Shiva begging his pardon.  Shiva not only forgave him, but also initiated him into the mysteries of Divine Wisdom.  Thereafter, when Shiva imbued the form of the yogi Dakshinamurti, Nandi also served as his mount.

Ox

If, as we have seen, the cow stands for wealth, then the ox stands for work.
Any castrated male animal of the cattle family, especially if it is to be used for hauling logs, a cart or a plow, can be called an ox.  The plural of ox is oxen, one of the few English words still in current use that retains the ancient ending in its plural form. 
A young ox is a bullock and that is how the mind is depicted in the first of
2009 ushers in the Year of the Female [Ch: yin] Earth "Ox," so let's face it, this is actually the Year of the Cow! 
The northern musk-ox, like oxen or yaks, are classified as Bovidae, but at least up to 1997,  it has been classified in the same sub-family as sheep and goats.  It likely received the "ox" part of its name due to its hefty and imposing appearance.   In folklore, it is often the general impression that matters, so since there is no apparent difference between the sexes except for the female's smaller size, she could satisfy our mental associations with the "ox" of East Asia's 12-animal calendar.  
 ~ 18th-century image < John Platts.  A Library of Wonders and Curiosities Found in Nature,  . . .   . 1884.

No Bull. Death is a Cow with Calf.
Aeons ago, during the time of Buddha Padmattara, a certain layman, seeing some monk being accorded a chief place in the sangha by that buddha, made the aspiration that he might achieve the same status under a future buddha.  After he had spent many intervening lives in the heavens, he became a monk under Buddha Kashyapa. Later, he finally took a human birth during the time of Buddha Shakyamuni.

Known as Bahia, after the land of his birth, he became a wealthy trader and managed to complete seven successful overseas voyages.  On his eighth trip, he was ship-wrecked though he did manage to reach shore where he emerged naked as the day he was born.  He made himself a garment of bark [perhaps as he had seen certain islanders do on his travels in the Pacific] and so he became known as Barkcloth-Bahiya.

He made it back to Sopara, the legendary port north of Bombay where people set sail for Shri Lanka and other exotic places in search of riches.  There, taking up a cocoanut shell, he wandered about for alms.  He was treated as a holy man, given homage and receiving the usual contributions of food, shelter, clothing and medicine.
Sceptics offered him various fine things to test him, but he realized what they were doing and did not give in.  That led to his being showered all the more with donations and respect so that he, himself, began to believe that he was one of the  arhats.

Just then, a devata who had once been a relative in a former existence, out of compassion for him and aware of the line of thinking that had arisen in his mind, went to where he was staying said, "Hold on there, Bahiya; you are neither an arhat nor have you even entered that path.  You don't even have the practice to become one!"

"Well, nagini, who in this world is one? Or who is even on the way?"

"Bahiya, there is a city in the north called Shravasti.  There there is one, a real self-awakened person -- a Buddha.  And he teaches the Dharma that leads to arhatship. "

Then Bahiya, chastened by his meeting with the spirit being, left Supparaka right then and, in the space of a day and a night, made it all the way to where the Blessed One was staying at Anathapindika's monastery in Jeta's Grove outside Shravasti.
At the time, a large number of monks were outside doing walking meditation.  He went over to them and said, "Where, venerable sirs, is the Buddha staying? We'd like to see him."

"He's gone into town for alms."

Then Bahiya hurriedly left the Grove and entering Shravasti, saw the Blessed One out "begging" for alms.  He seemed so calm and so calming, his senses and his mind at peace, tranquil and poised in the ultimate sense, accomplished, trained, composed and restrained.  Just like a Naga.
So seeing him, Bahiya went over and threw himself down prostrate at His feet.  He said, "Teach me the Dharma, Blessed One! Please, teach me, Tatagatha, something that will benefit me in the long run and make me happy."

The Buddha replied, "This is not the time, Bahiya. We are here in town for alms."

A second time, Bahiya said to the Buddha, "But anything could happen at any moment to you or to me. Teach me the Dharma, O Blessed One! Please, teach me, Tathagatha, what will help me and make me happy in the long run."

A second time, the Blessed One answered, "Not now, Bahiya.  We have come here for alms."

So a third time, Bahiya said to the Buddha, "But our lives could end here and now. Teach me the Dharma, Blessed One! Teach me the Dharma, Tathagata, so that I may be helped and be happy forever."

"OK, Bahiya. This is it:
When you see something, just see it.
When you hear something, just hear it.
When you feel something, then feel it.  And when you are aware of something, just know it.
That is how you should train yourself.   So that when for you there is only the seen in reference to what is seen, only the heard in reference to what is heard, only the sensed in reference to what is sensed, and only the cognized in reference to what you cognize, then Bahia, there will not be any distinctions any longer.
So that when you are not "thereby", you will not be 'therein.'  When you are not "therein", you will be neither 'here' nor 'there' nor in between. This, just this, is the end of stress."

Through hearing this brief explanation of the Dharma from the Blessed One, the mind of Bark-cloth Bahiya  right then and there was released from consequences [or karma] through lack of clinging/desire.  Having instructed Bark-cloth Bahiya with this brief explanation of the Dharma, the Blessed One left.

And not long after that, Bahiya -- attacked by a cow with her calf -- lost his life.
Then the Blessed One, having gone out to Shravasti, and then returning from his alms round and having eaten a meal together with a large number of monks, saw that Bahiya had died.
On seeing him, he said to the monks, "Take Bahiya's body up on a litter and carry it away and cremate it; then build him a memorial. Your companion in the holy life has died."

"As you say, lord," the monks replied. After doing what the Buddha had told them to, they went back to the Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As they were sitting there, they said to him, "Bahiya's body has been cremated, lord, and his memorial has been built.  What will happen to him? What is his future state?"

"Monks, Bark-cloth Bahia was wise. He practiced the Dharma in accordance with the Dharma and did not pester me with issues related to it.  Bark-cloth Bahiya has achieved nirvana - he has been released."

Then, realizing the significance of that, he exclaimed:
Where water, earth, fire, and wind have no footing:
There the stars do not shine, the sun is not visible,
the moon does not appear, darkness is not found.
And when a sage, a noble person, through sagacity
has known [this] for himself, then from form & formless,
from bliss & pain, he is freed.
                ~ Khuddaka, Udana 1-10
Much later, according to the Dhammapada (v. 101, or Thousands v. 2) when Buddha was telling his disciples that Bahia had attained release after hearing just one verse, a monk asked how it was possible for a single verse to lead to Nirvana.  The Buddha answered:
Better than a thousand verses comprising useless words, is one single beneficial line that through the hearing of it, one is pacified.
~ Tan Chade Meng

Bull of No-Death

To Hindus and Buddhists, the King of Dharma and Lord of Death are one and the same: Yama, here with his sister/consort Yami and their water buffalo are shown in a bronze image at the Patan Museum, Nepal.
One of the Tibetan Buddhist dharmapalas is a manifestation of Manjushri, the midnight blue Defeater-of-death, Yamantaka also called Yamari (Yama's enemy) or Vajrabhairava (absolutely terrifying) who may be depicted as riding or standing on a bull while trampling Yama, god of death, underfoot. 

The Golden Calf

In the most ancient Indian texts, the Vedas:
Wise poets have spun a seven-strand tale 
around this heavenly calf, the Sun.

~ Dirghatama Rishi, Rig Veda 1.164.5

In Genesis 32 we learn how Aaron the princely brother of Moses decided that it would benefit the wandering Israelites to have a visible, tangible representation.  He (24) . . . told them, 'Whoever has any gold jewelry, take it off.' and "Then they gave me the gold, and I threw it into the fire, and out came this calf!"   It is as if the bits of gold cohered of themselves to form the calf -- the ultimate symbol of prosperity.
Later (Deuteronomy 9: 21) we find that Moses " took that sinful thing of yours, the calf you had made, and burned it in the fire.  Then . . .  crushed it and ground it to powder as fine as dust and threw the dust into a stream that flowed down the mountain."
Of all the Israelites, the descendants of Levi were the only sept (sub-clan) that remained true to the-god-without-form, and so they had the duty and the honour of being attendants at the temple in Jerusalem where the sacred Ark of the Covenant was later installed.
White Buffalo-Calf Woman
The symbolic animal is correctly referred to as a bison, but we could say that a bison is a type of buffalo, just as a yak is.
At least a thousand years ago, the Lakota Sioux, a people of the American plains (who had migrated south from their Iroquoian homeland), say that at a time of extreme drought and lack of game, a female spirit (wakan) appeared to two brothers.  The one who reached out to touch her was incinerated.
HH Kusum Lingpa Rinpoche identified White Buffalo Woman as Yeshe Tsogyal.  He believes that she is the one who delivered the first pipe --  he considers it a ter -- to the first pipe guardian. (Chief Arvol Looking Horse is the current guardian of the Sacred Pipe of the Lakota.)
  • The selling of culture necessitates a coalition for the protection of ceremonies.
     ________________________________________________________________
Basques:  These distinctive people, who inhabit Western Spain, have a language (like Burushaski that is spoken in the Himalayas) that is one of the world's few unique tongues.  Geneticist Luiga Luca Cavalli-Sforza found Basques strikingly different from their neighbors as far as heredity.
Govinda: The Indian religious path that emphasizes devotion to deity is called bhakti, and one way to practice this is by singing bajan or hymns.  "Govinda" is probably one of the most famous of these, for the arrangement on an EP disc that also included the Krishna mantra by George Harrison of The Beatles (Apple Records, 1970) made the Top Ten on British record charts.
The traditional bhajan [song of praise]:
Govinda jaya jaya, Gopala jaya jaya,
Râdhâ-ramana Hari, Govinda jaya jaya.

Back ] Home ] Up ] Next ]
The Bear ] [ Cattle:  Cow, Bull & Calf ] Deer ] Dog ] Elephant ] Goat & Sheep ] Hare & Rabbit ] Horse ] Lion ] Monkey ] Pig, Sow & Boar ] Rhinoceros ] Serpent ] Birds ] Tortoise ] Fish ]
 

Copyright 1998-2012 Khandro.Net  All rights reserved. 
This comprehensive web site is designed with Firefox as browser but should be accessible in others.  However, if you eliminate underlining in your Preferences you might miss some of our 5, 000+ links. 

Taken from:
http://www.khandro.net/animal_cow_bull.htm
 

Monday, February 8, 2010

New Testament's Magi Incident Absorbed into Buddhism










 
Childhood of Jesus
 
Before going on to record Kersten's amazing comparisons between Jesus and the Buddha, (see next post), we should like to pause for a moment to touch upon a fascinating matter that the author has raised regarding the Nativity of Jesus and the Magi's star, on the one hand, and the Tibetan practice of locating child reincarnations of deceased Buddhist Dalai Lamas on the other.
 
In his 'Who Were the Three Wise Men?' (Chapter 4), Kersten firstly concludes on p. 63 that:
 
"At this distance in time it is well-nigh impossible to prove that the Magi came from either Persia or from India".

Then he introduces his fascinating new twist:

Yet it is absolutely amazing how much the story of the three wise men corresponds with accounts of the methods by which reincarnations of great Buddhist dignitaries are located in Tibet after their demise, even to this day. The way in which such a search is carried out, following ancient and traditional ritual, is described in the present Dalai Lama's own accounts of his 'discovery' as a little boy, and in the book by the Austrian Heinrich Harrer, who spent seven years at the court of the god-king in Lhasa.

And on p. 64, Kersten goes on to write regarding the 1937 search for the child of destiny:

… Most important to these preparations were the pronouncements of the astrologers, without whose calculations no significant moves could be made at all. At last, in 1937, various expeditions were dispatched from Lhasa to seek out the holy child according to the heavenly omens, in the direction indicated. Each group included wise and worthy lamas of highly distinguished status in the theocracy. In addition to their servants, each group took costly gifts with them ….
 
Is this yet another far eastern tradition that has arisen from a biblical prototype, namely the Gospel account of the Magi's visit to the Christ-child in Bethlehem (Matthew 2:1-11)?
....